The DB Method Journal

Editorial Standards

Clear evidence, honest limits and useful coaching context.

The DB Method Journal helps women make better-informed decisions about strength training, movement, body composition, recovery and long-term health. These standards explain who is behind the content, how sources are selected and where professional boundaries sit.

Explore the Journal

Who is responsible

Coaching expertise, stated accurately.

The journal is published under the editorial direction of Deja Broadway, founder of The DB Method. Deja is a UK-trained personal trainer and women’s performance coach with more than 10 years of coaching experience and over 250 women coached.

Her professional focus includes women’s strength training, body recomposition, movement assessment, corrective exercise, mobility, recovery-aware programming and practical nutrition education. This experience informs the coaching context in each article.

Deja is not presented as a doctor, physiotherapist or dietitian. Articles identify when diagnosis, treatment, medication, hormone therapy, injury care or individual clinical advice belongs with an appropriately qualified healthcare professional.

Research and review

How an article is built.

The standard is not to sound scientific. It is to make the strength and limits of the evidence understandable.

01

Start with the reader’s question

Each article answers a practical question that women commonly bring to coaching, without manufacturing a problem or promising one universal solution.

02

Use an evidence hierarchy

Position stands, systematic reviews, peer-reviewed research and official public-health guidance are preferred. Individual studies are not treated as definitive when the wider evidence is mixed.

03

Separate evidence from experience

Research findings, practical coaching observations and reasonable interpretation are kept distinct. Uncertainty and important limitations are stated rather than hidden.

04

Make the next step useful

Articles translate principles into realistic training or lifestyle actions while avoiding diagnosis, individual treatment plans and unsupported health claims.

Accuracy and safety

Health information deserves restraint.

Women’s health content can influence important decisions. Trust matters more than dramatic claims.

Sources are linked where they materially support the article.

Claims are qualified when human evidence is limited, conflicting or mainly preclinical.

Supplements, peptides and therapies are discussed without selling or sourcing them.

Red flags and professional boundaries are included where they help a reader act safely.

Publication dates are not changed simply to make old content appear new.

Professional scope: The journal is educational and does not replace medical diagnosis, treatment, physiotherapy, dietetic care or individual advice from a qualified healthcare professional.

Updates and corrections

Changed when the evidence changes.

Articles may be revised when important new evidence, guidance or safety information changes the practical conclusion. A modification date is updated only when the page has been meaningfully reviewed or changed.

If you believe an article contains a factual error, a broken source or wording that could be clearer, contact The DB Method through WhatsApp. The point will be checked against the source material and corrected where appropriate.

Read with context

Evidence for education. Coaching for the individual.

Use the journal to understand the principles, then choose a coaching route when you want those principles applied to your own goals, movement and real life.

Browse the Journal
Explore the Journal